4.3 Article

Population-based study of antiepileptic drug exposure in utero-Influence on head circumference in newborns

期刊

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 672-675

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.09.002

关键词

Carbamazepine; Pregnancy; Valproic acid; Lamotrigine; Microcephaly

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council-Medicine
  2. NARSAD
  3. Swedish Society of Medicine
  4. Karolinska Institutet Foundation
  5. Evy and Gunnar Sandberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To study the effect of AED exposure on head circumference in the newborn. Methods: Data on all Swedish singletons births between 1995 and 2005, over 900,000 births, were obtained from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. The effects of AEDs on birth-weight-adjusted mean head circumference (bw-adj-HC) were estimated by comparison with data from all births in an analysis which was adjusted for year of birth, maternal age, parity, maternal smoking, and maternal body mass index. Results: A significant reduction of mean bw-adj-HC was seen after both carbamazepine (CBZ) (standard deviation scores (SDS) = 0.15, p < 0.001) and valproic acid (VPA) (SDS = 0.10, p = 0.04) in monotherapy. No effect on mean bw-adj-HC was seen for phenytoin, clonazepam, lamotrigine and gabapentin. There was a significant increase in the occurrence of microcephaly (bw-adj-HC smaller than 2 SD below the mean) after any AED polytherapy (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.74-4.78) but not after AED monotherapy or monotherapy with CBZ or VPA. CBZ OF VPA was taken by 71% of the pregnant mothers on AED, and the usage increased over time. Conclusions: CBZ and VPA in monotherapy during pregnancy reduce mean bw-adj-HC. AED polytherapy increases the rate of microcephaly but no significant effect is seen of AED monotherapy. The possible significance for the further development of the child is uncertain but should be explored. (C) 2009 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据