4.3 Article

The role of strigolactones in host specificity of Orobanche and Phelipanche seed germination

期刊

SEED SCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 55-61

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0960258510000371

关键词

broomrape; fabacyl acetate; germination; GR24; parasitic plants; strigol

资金

  1. European Regional Development (FEDER) funds [P07-AGR-02883, AGL2008-01239/AGR]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strigolactones are apocarotenoids regulating shoot branching. They are also known to be exuded by plant roots at very low concentrations, stimulating hyphal branching of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and germination of root parasitic weed seeds. We show that strigolactones play a major role in host specificity of Orobanche and Phelipanche (the broomrapes) seed germination. This observation confirms that host-derived germination stimulants are an important component determining the host specificity of these parasitic plants. Weedy broomrape species were less specialized in germination requirements than the non-weedy species except for O. cumana and O. foetida var. broteri. Similar results were obtained with the root exudates. Some species, such as P. aegyptiaca and O. minor, showed a broad spectrum of host specificity in terms of seed germination, which was stimulated by exudates from the majority of species tested, whereas others, such as O. cumana, O. hederae and O. densiflora, were highly specific. Some species, such as O. minor, P. aegyptiaca and P. nana, were responsive to the three strigolactones studied, whereas others were induced by only one of them, or did not respond to them at all. The synthetic strigolactone analogue GR24, generally used as a standard for germination tests, was not effective on some Orobanche and Phelipanche species. Seeds of some species that did not respond to GR24 were induced to germinate in the presence of fabacyl acetate or strigol, confirming the role of strigolactones in host specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据