4.6 Article

U-Pb and Hf isotopic study of detrital zircons from the Yejishan Group of the Luliang Complex: Constraints on the timing of collision between the Eastern and Western Blocks, North China Craton

期刊

SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
卷 236, 期 1-2, 页码 129-140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2011.01.001

关键词

Luliang Complex; Trans-North China Orogen; North China Craton; Detr tat zircon; Fore and basin; Paleoproterozoic

类别

资金

  1. Hong Kong RGC GRF [7063/06P, 7066/07P, 7053/08P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Trans-North China Orogen is a recently recognized continent-continent collisional belt along which the discrete Eastern and Western Blocks amalgamated to form the coherent basement of the North China Craton. However, there is a hot debate on the timing of the collision between the two blocks, with one school of thought arguing the collision occurred at 2.5 Ga, whereas others believe it took place at similar to 1.85 Ga. U-Pb ages and Hf isotopic data of detrital zircons from foreland basins in the Trans-North China Orogen can provide rigorous constraints on this controversial issue. One of such foreland basins is represented by the Yejishan Group in the Luliang Complex in the middle sector of the western margin of the Trans-North China Orogen. The group consists of conglomerates, quartz wackes, sandstones and minor limestones, most of which contain large amounts of detrital zircons. CL. images reveal that nearly all detrital zircons from the Yejishan Group possess oscillatory zoning, with Th/U ratios of 0.2-2.34, typical of an igneous origin. The Pb-207/Pb-206 ages of detrital zircons range between 3.24 and 1.81 Ga, with most having Paleoproterozoic ages, of which the youngest group ages are around 1.87-1.81 Ga. This indicates that the foreland basin in which the Yejishan Group was deposited must have formed not earlier than 1.87-1.81 Ga thus supporting the collision between the Eastern and Western Blocks at similar to 1.85 Ga, not at similar to 2.5 Ga. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据