4.6 Article

Interrelated continental sedimentary environments in the central Iberian Range (Spain): Facies characterization and main palaeoenvironmental changes during the Holocene

期刊

SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
卷 239, 期 1-2, 页码 87-103

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2011.06.005

关键词

Lake; Fluvial tufas; Wetland; Holocene; Iberian Range; Spain

类别

资金

  1. Spanish Government [CGL2009-09165BTE, CGL2009-13990-C02-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A complex Holocene system in the central Iberian Range (NE Spain) has been reconstructed on the basis of sediments recovered from cores and in situ observations. Small alluvial fans graded into a wide shallow lacustrine area (Anavieja Lake) that connected downstream with a carbonate fluvial system with associated vegetated zones. The fluvial system was mainly characterized by the development of tufa barriers (especially during the first part of the Holocene) that separated pools or small lakes. Oncolites, detrital tufas, calcarenites and marls were deposited in these pools. Adjacent vegetated areas were covered by macrophytes and were episodically reached by detrital tufa supplies indicating high flood stages. High sedimentary rates existed in both the fluvial (including the pools) and vegetated areas suggesting that, despite the common erosion of tufas, a clear aggradating evolution existed. By contrast, very low sedimentary rates were registered in the Anavieja Lake. All the environments, but especially the vegetated areas, registered the climate evolution during the Holocene. Although the onset of the Holocene was characterized by wide climate variability, warm and humid conditions dominated during the first part and drier conditions during the second part. A water level recovery seems to have been existed during the last millennium. This is a good example of the potential of continental systems other than lakes to be useful for palaeoenvironmental and palaeoclimatic studies. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据