4.7 Article

Worldwide variations in artificial skyglow

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep08409

关键词

-

资金

  1. MILIEU (FU Berlin)
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [BMBF-033L038A]
  3. EU COST Action (Loss of the Night Network) [ES1204]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the EU's Seventh Framework Program (FP7)/ERC [268504]
  5. Spanish Network for Light Pollution Studies [AYA2011-15808-E]
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Goddard Space Flight Center)
  7. Ohio State University
  8. University of Iowa
  9. Adam Mickiewicz University
  10. [AYA2012-31277]
  11. [AYA-2012-30717]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite constituting a widespread and significant environmental change, understanding of artificial nighttime skyglow is extremely limited. Until now, published monitoring studies have been local or regional in scope, and typically of short duration. In this first major international compilation of monitoring data we answer several key questions about skyglow properties. Skyglow is observed to vary over four orders of magnitude, a range hundreds of times larger than was the case before artificial light. Nearly all of the study sites were polluted by artificial light. A non-linear relationship is observed between the sky brightness on clear and overcast nights, with a change in behavior near the rural to urban landuse transition. Overcast skies ranged from a third darker to almost 18 times brighter than clear. Clear sky radiances estimated by the World Atlas of Artificial Night Sky Brightness were found to be overestimated by similar to 25%; our dataset will play an important role in the calibration and ground truthing of future skyglow models. Most of the brightly lit sites darkened as the night progressed, typically by similar to 5% per hour. The great variation in skyglow radiance observed from site-to-site and with changing meteorological conditions underlines the need for a long-term international monitoring program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据