4.7 Article

Development of a procedure for production of haploid plants through microspore culture of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.)

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 52-61

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.07.028

关键词

Microspore; Haploid; Genetic variant; Ploidy level; Hibiscus sabdariffa L.; Callus induction; Regenerants

资金

  1. Roselle Research Program under Science Fund [05-01-02-SF0057]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
  3. Universiti Malaysia Terengganu

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Attempts to obtain new variants of roselle through conventional breeding were unsuccessful for 358 trials of (UKMR-3 x UKMR-2) and 63 trials of (UKMR-3 x accession 3). Roselle is an autotetraploid plant (2n = 4x = 72). Therefore the objectives of this study were to obtain new variants in roselle through the establishment of a plant regeneration system via microspore culture followed by detection of the ploidy level of regenerants based on their distinctive PCR patterns. The effects of different media and hormonal combinations were evaluated on microspore culture of roselle. This method was effective for callus induction, early-stage embryo development and subsequently efficient plant regeneration. Pretreatment of microspores at 4 degrees C and 35 degrees C for 3 days in the dark and without pretreatment, showed significant results on percentage of callus induction. Thirty regenerants were evaluated for their ploidy level using flow cytometry combined with propidium iodide and only 1 was detected as haploid, 4 mixploids and 25 diploids. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using M13 universal primer (5'-TTATGAAACGACGGCCAGT-3') showed the regenerated haploid plant having four unique bands at loci M13-01, M13-03, M13-04, and M13-06, which were absent in the microspore donor plant UKMR-1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the development of haploid plants in roselle via microspore culture. 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据