4.7 Article

Effects of temperature and packaging atmosphere on total antioxidants and colour of walnut (Juglans regia L.) kernels during storage

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 49-57

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.09.026

关键词

Phenolics; Antioxidant capacity; Colour; Walnut kernels; Storage; Walnut browning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of cultivar and storage conditions (time, temperature and O-2 availability) on total phenolics (TP), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and colour in walnut kernels of three cultivars (Chandler, Hartley and Ioli) were investigated. Harvested walnuts were dried at 36 degrees C for 24h, packaged in polyethylenellpolyamide pouches flushed with dry air or N-2 or CO2 and stored at 1 degrees C or 20 degrees C for up to 12 mo. Before storage, dried kernels exhibited the highest values of L., h. and whiteness index (WI) colour parameters, as well as the highest TP content and TAC assessed either with FRAP or DPPH assays. Chandler and Hartley exhibited much higher antioxidant levels than Ioli during the whole experiment, while Ioli exhibited the highest at least before storage. During storage, browning (decreases in L*, h(-), WI) and antioxidant losses were observed by advanced time. After 12 mo, the greatest losses of TP, FRAP and DPPH in all studied cultivars were observed in kernels stored at 20 degrees C under air, and averaged approximately 48%, 38% and 40%, respectively. Low temperature and packaging under N-2 or CO2 prevented additively both antioxidant losses and browning. Pairwise correlation and Principal Component Analyses revealed strong relationships among TP, FRAP and DPPH values, as well as, between TP and colour parameters (L*, h(-) and WI). These relationships indicated that the decreases in antioxidants of stored walnut kernels are responsible not only for the nutritional loss, but also for the quality deterioration in relation to consumer visual perception. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据