4.7 Article

Somatic embryogenesis in Cymbopogon pendulus and evaluation of clonal fidelity of regenerants using ISSR marker

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 123, 期 4, 页码 505-513

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.10.011

关键词

Somatic embryogenesis; Cymbopogon pendulus; Plant regeneration; ISSR marker; Genetic fidelity

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient plant propagation system through somatic embryogenesis was established in Cymbopogon pendulus, an aromatic grass followed by analysis of genetic status of regenerants using ISSR markers. Optimum embryogenic callus induction was observed on MS basal medium supplemented with 13.57 mu M 2,4-dicholorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) with 8.88 mu M N-6-benzyladenine (BA). Subsequent culturing of embryogenic calli on MS medium containing 4.52 mu M 2,4-D and 8.88-13.32 mu M BA gave maximum number of somatic embryos. Addition of coconut water (CW) promoted induction, growth and differentiation of callus and somatic embryogenesis. Further development of embryos into plantlets was achieved on MS medium supplemented with lower concentration of biotin and Calcium pantothenate (CaP) along with BA (4.44-13.32 mu M) and kinetin (2.32-4.65 mu M). The root meristems were established on half strength MS medium containing 2% sucrose and 2.46-9.84 mu M Indole3-butyric acid (IBA) and successfully established in soil with 77.8% survival rate in field condition. Thirteen randomly selected regenerated clones were screened using six ISSR primers. Nine clones produced similar monomorphic amplification profiles while remaining clones showed minor variation with absence of certain parental bands and appearance of unique hand. Majority of the regenerants maintained genetic fidelity with the generation of few variants as evidenced from similarity matrix estimates using Nei Li's coefficient of similarity data. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据