4.7 Article

Characteristics of phosphorus uptake kinetics of poinsettia and marigold

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 251-257

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.05.009

关键词

Uptake rate; Relative growth rate; Plant age; Temperature; Light intensity; Photoperiod

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a previous experiment it has been found that maximum uptake rate (I(max)), Michaelis constant (K(m)), and minimum nutrient concentration (C(min)) as plant physiological characteristics may be important for phosphorus (P) uptake in peat-substrate. Thus, variation of P uptake parameters was evaluated with a series of depletion studies for poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima) and marigold (Tagetes patula) under fluctuating climatic conditions and different developmental stages. Relative growth rate (RGR) of marigold was higher than that of poinsettia and declined for both crops with plant age. Lower air temperature reduced the RGR of poinsettia, but not of marigold. However, the lower light intensity reduced the RGR of marigold while it had no effect on the RGR of poinsettia. A short photoperiod reduced the RGR of poinsettia. Maximum uptake rate also decreased with plant age and with decrease of air temperature for both poinsettia and marigold; however, it was independent of light intensity. Maximum uptake rate of poinsettia was lower during short photoperiod than that of longer photoperiod. A close correlation between RGR and I(max) was observed with both poinsettia and marigold throughout all treatments. The K(m) and C(min) were affected neither by plant age, air temperature, light intensity nor by day length. However, higher I(max), but lower K(m) and C(min) values were observed for marigold than for poinsettia during all treatments. The required P availability in the substrate was not much affected by short term fluctuations of growing conditions and photoperiod. However, it was clearly reduced with plant age for both crops which should be considered for fertilization. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据