4.7 Article

Global effects of agriculture on fluvial dissolved organic matter

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep16328

关键词

-

资金

  1. project ECOGLOBE (DFF, Denmark) [09-067335]
  2. project DONCOPRA [PU 136/7-1, CRA-80/10]
  3. project CARBONET (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) [CGL2011-30474-C02-01]
  4. project ANII-FCE (Fondo Clemente Estable, Uruguay) [2009 2749]
  5. project ANII-FCE (Conicyt, Chile) [PAI 79100016]
  6. project ANII-FCE (Universidad Austral de Chile) [DID-UACh SE-2011-2]
  7. DCE - Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, Aarhus University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural land covers approximately 40% of Earth's land surface and affects hydromorphological, biogeochemical and ecological characteristics of fluvial networks. In the northern temperate region, agriculture also strongly affects the amount and molecular composition of dissolved organic matter (DOM), which constitutes the main vector of carbon transport from soils to fluvial networks and to the sea, and is involved in a large variety of biogeochemical processes. Here, we provide first evidence about the wider occurrence of agricultural impacts on the concentration and composition of fluvial DOM across climate zones of the northern and southern hemispheres. Both extensive and intensive farming altered fluvial DOM towards a more microbial and less plant-derived composition. Moreover, intensive farming significantly increased dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) concentrations. The DOM composition change and DON concentration increase differed among climate zones and could be related to the intensity of current and historical nitrogen fertilizer use. As a result of agriculture intensification, increased DON concentrations and a more microbial-like DOM composition likely will enhance the reactivity of catchment DOM emissions, thereby fuelling the biogeochemical processing in fluvial networks, and resulting in higher ecosystem productivity and CO2 outgassing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据