4.8 Article

Rapid and specific labeling of single live Mycobacterium tuberculosis with a dual-targeting fluorogenic probe

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 454, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aar4470

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [1R01AI125286-01A1, U54CA199075]
  2. Stanford Center at Peking University Faculty Fellowship
  3. Center for Molecular Analysis and Design (CMAD) at Stanford
  4. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development [XMLX201812]
  5. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z181100001718181]
  6. Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research [2018-2Z-1042, 2016-2-1043]
  7. Zhejiang 151 Talent Training Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a public health crisis and a leading cause of infection-related death globally. Although in high demand, imaging technologies that enable rapid, specific, and nongenetic labeling of live Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) remain underdeveloped. We report a dual-targeting strategy to develop a small molecular probe (CDG-DNB3) that can fluorescently label single bacilli within 1 hour. CDG-DNB3 fluoresces upon activation of the beta-lactamase BlaC, a hydrolase naturally expressed in Mtb, and the fluorescent product is retained through covalent modification of the Mtb essential enzyme decaprenylphosphoryl-beta-D-ribose 2'-epimerase (DprE1).This dual-targeting probe not only discriminates live from dead Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) but also shows specificity for Mtb over other bacterial species including 43 nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM). In addition, CDG-DNB3 can image BCG phagocytosis in real time, as well as Mtb in patients' sputum. Together with a low-cost, self-driven microfluidic chip, we have achieved rapid labeling and automated quantification of live BCG. This labeling approach should find many potential applications for research toward TB pathogenesis, treatment efficacy assessment, and diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据