4.8 Review

Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 265, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) German Research Foundation [SFB829]
  2. NRW/EU Ziel 2-Programm Europaischer Fond fur regionale Entwicklung (EFRE)
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. Cancer Research UK
  6. British Heart Foundation and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  7. NIH [5R01NR013881, 9R01DK098055]
  8. British Heart Foundation [PG/12/13/29434] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [MR/J002577/1, G0901822] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Wellcome Trust [097791/Z/11/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. MRC [G0901822, MR/J002577/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cellular and molecular mechanisms underpinning tissue repair and its failure to heal are still poorly understood, and current therapies are limited. Poor wound healing after trauma, surgery, acute illness, or chronic disease conditions affects millions of people worldwide each year and is the consequence of poorly regulated elements of the healthy tissue repair response, including inflammation, angiogenesis, matrix deposition, and cell recruitment. Failure of one or several of these cellular processes is generally linked to an underlying clinical condition, such as vascular disease, diabetes, or aging, which are all frequently associated with healing pathologies. The search for clinical strategies that might improve the body's natural repair mechanisms will need to be based on a thorough understanding of the basic biology of repair and regeneration. In this review, we highlight emerging concepts in tissue regeneration and repair, and provide some perspectives on how to translate current knowledge into viable clinical approaches for treating patients with wound-healing pathologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据