4.8 Article

Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 245, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008973

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut National du Cancer-Canceropole d'lle-de-France [PL06-048, ACI-2007, PLBIO-2011-13]
  2. Institut Curie (ICP) [INCa 2011-189]
  3. Comprehensive Cancer Center SIRIC program of Institut Curie [INCa 2011-189]
  4. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vitro studies suggested that sub-millisecond pulses of radiation elicit less genomic instability than continuous, protracted irradiation at the same total dose. To determine the potential of ultrahigh dose-rate irradiation in radiotherapy, we investigated lung fibrogenesis in C57BL/6J mice exposed either to short pulses (<= 500 ms) of radiation delivered at ultrahigh dose rate (>= 40 Gy/s, FLASH) or to conventional dose-rate irradiation (<= 0.03 Gy/s, CONV) in single doses. The growth of human HBCx-12A and HEp-2 tumor xenografts in nude mice and syngeneic TC-1 Luc(+) orthotopic lung tumors in C57BL/6J mice was monitored under similar radiation conditions. CONV (15 Gy) triggered lung fibrosis associated with activation of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) cascade, whereas no complications developed after doses of FLASH below 20 Gy for more than 36 weeks after irradiation. FLASH irradiation also spared normal smooth muscle and epithelial cells from acute radiation-induced apoptosis, which could be reinduced by administration of systemic TNF-alpha (tumor necrosis factor-alpha) before irradiation. in contrast, FLASH was as efficient as CONV in the repression of tumor growth. Together, these results suggest that FLASH radiotherapy might allow complete eradication of lung tumors and reduce the occurrence and severity of early and late complications affecting normal tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据