4.8 Article

A Pyrrolo-Pyrimidine Derivative Targets Human Primary AML Stem Cells in Vivo

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 181, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004387

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through the Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers (NEXT Program)
  2. Council for Science and Technology Policy (CSTP)
  3. Targeted Proteins Research Program (TPRP)
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  5. NIH Cancer Core grant [CA34196]
  6. JSPS through the Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (First Program)
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24111001] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) that survive conventional chemotherapy are thought to contribute to disease relapse, leading to poor long-term outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We previously identified a Src-family kinase (SFK) member, hematopoietic cell kinase (HCK), as a molecular target that is highly differentially expressed in human primary LSCs compared with human normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). We performed a large-scale chemical library screen that integrated a high-throughput enzyme inhibition assay, in silico binding prediction, and crystal structure determination and found a candidate HCK inhibitor, RK-20449, a pyrrolo-pyrimidine derivative with an enzymatic IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) in the subnanomolar range. A crystal structure revealed that RK-20449 bound the activation pocket of HCK. In vivo administration of RK-20449 to nonobese diabetic (NOD)/severe combined immunodeficient (SCID)/IL2rg(null) mice engrafted with highly aggressive therapy-resistant AML significantly reduced human LSC and non-stem AML burden. By eliminating chemotherapy-resistant LSCs, RK-20449 may help to prevent relapse and lead to improved patient outcomes in AML.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据