4.8 Article

Changes in Amyloid-β and Tau in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Transgenic Mice Overexpressing Amyloid Precursor Protein

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 194, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006446

关键词

-

资金

  1. Competence Network on Degenerative Dementias [BMBF-01GI0705]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/66216/2009]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/66216/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Altered concentrations of amyloid-beta (A beta) peptide and Tau protein in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are thought to be predictive markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Transgenic mice overexpressing human amyloid precursor protein (APP) have been used to model A beta pathology, but concomitant changes in A beta and Tau in CSF have been less well studied. We measured A beta and Tau in the brains and CSF of two well-characterized transgenic mouse models of AD: one expressing human APP carrying the Swedish mutation (APP23) and the other expressing mutant human APP and mutant human presenilin-1 (APPPS1). Both mouse models exhibit A beta deposition in the brain, but with different onset and progression trajectories. We found an age-related 50 to 80% decrease in A beta 42 peptide in mouse CSF and a smaller decrease in A beta 40, both inversely correlated with the brain A beta load. Surprisingly, the same mice showed a threefold increase in total endogenous murine Tau in CSF at the stages when A beta pathology became prominent. The results mirror the temporal sequence and magnitude of A beta and Tau changes in the CSF of patients with sporadic and dominantly inherited AD. This observation indicates that APP transgenic mice may be useful as a translational tool for predicting changes in A beta and Tau markers in the CSF of AD patients. These findings also suggest that APP transgenic mouse models may be useful in the search for new disease markers for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据