4.5 Article

PIP4kγ is a substrate for mTORC1 that maintains basal mTORC1 signaling during starvation

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 7, 期 350, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2005191

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [RO1-DK63219-06]
  2. NIH ARRA (American Recovery & Reinvestment Act) [DK63219-06S1A1]
  3. NIH [5P01CA120964-04]
  4. NIH DF/HCC (Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center) Cancer Center Support grant [5P30CA006516-46]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphatidylinositol-5-phosphate 4-kinases (PIP4ks) are a family of lipid kinases that specifically use phosphatidylinositol 5-monophosphate (PI-5-P) as a substrate to synthesize phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [ PI(4,5)P-2]. Suppression of PIP4k function in Drosophila results in smaller cells and reduced target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) signaling. We showed that the gamma isoform of PIP4k stimulated signaling through mammalian TORC1 (mTORC1). Knockdown of PIP4k gamma reduced cell mass in cells in which mTORC1 is constitutively activated by Tsc2 deficiency. In Tsc2 null cells, mTORC1 activation was partially independent of amino acids or glucose and glutamine. PIP4k gamma knockdown inhibited the nutrient-independent activation of mTORC1 in Tsc2 knockdown cells and reduced basal mTORC1 signaling in wild-type cells. PIP4kg was phosphorylated by mTORC1 and associated with the complex. Phosphorylated PIP4kg was enriched in light microsomal vesicles, whereas the unphosphorylated form was enriched in heavy microsomal vesicles associated with the Golgi. Furthermore, basal mTORC1 signaling was enhanced by overexpression of unphosphorylated wild-type PIP4k gamma or a phosphorylation-defective mutant and decreased by overexpression of a phosphorylation-mimetic mutant. Together, these results demonstrate that PIP4k gamma and mTORC1 interact in a self-regulated feedback loop to maintain low and tightly regulated mTORC1 activation during starvation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据