4.5 Article

Transglutaminase-Catalyzed Protein-Protein Cross-Linking Suppresses the Activity of the NF-κB-Like Transcription Factor Relish

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 6, 期 285, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2003970

关键词

-

资金

  1. Takeda Science Foundation
  2. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [24117712, 24570164]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23890147]
  5. Kyushu University Interdisciplinary Programs in Education and Projects in Research Development (PP type D-3) [24358]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23890147, 24117712, 24770099, 24570164] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cross-linking of proteins by mammalian transglutaminases (TGs) plays important roles in physiological phenomena such as blood coagulation and skin formation. We show that Drosophila TG suppressed innate immune signaling in the gut. RNA interference (RNAi) directed against TG reduced the life span of flies reared under conventional nonsterile conditions but not of those raised under germ-free conditions. In conventionally reared flies, TG RNAi enhanced the expression of genes encoding antimicrobial peptides in the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway. Wild-type flies that ingested gut lysates prepared from conventionally reared TG RNAi-treated flies had shorter life spans. In conventionally reared flies, TG RNAi triggered apoptosis in the gut and induced the nuclear translocation of Relish, the NF-kappa B (nuclear factor kappa B)-like transcription factor of the IMD pathway. Wild-type flies that ingested synthetic amine donors, which inhibit the TG-catalyzed protein-protein cross-linking reaction, showed nuclear translocation of Relish and enhanced expression of genes encoding IMD-controlled antimicrobial peptide genes in the gut. We conclude that TG-catalyzed Relish cross-linking suppressed the IMD signaling pathway to enable immune tolerance against commensal microbes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据