4.7 Article

Combination of magnetic parameters and heavy metals to discriminate soil-contamination sources in Yinchuan - A typical oasis city of Northwestern China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 485, 期 -, 页码 83-92

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.070

关键词

Environmental magnetism; Soil pollution; Heavy metals; Yinchuan

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2013-m03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071125, 90502008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various industrial processes and vehicular traffic result in harmful emissions containing both magnetic minerals and heavy metals. In this study, we investigated the levels of magnetic and heavy metal contamination of topsoils from Yinchuan city in northwestern China. The results demonstrate that magnetic mineral assemblages in the topsoil are dominated by pseudo-single domain (PSD) and multi-domain (MD) magnetite. The concentrations of anthropogenic heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn) and the magnetic properties of chi(1f), SIRM, chi(ARM), and 'SOFT' and 'HARD' remanence are significantly correlated, suggesting that the magnetic minerals and heavy metals have common sources. Combined use of principal components and fuzzy cluster analysis of the magnetic and chemical data set indicates that the magnetic and geochemical properties of the particulates emitted from different sources vary significantly. Samples from university campus and residential areas are mainly affected by crustal material, with low concentrations of magnetic minerals and heavy metals, while industrial pollution sources are characterized by high concentrations of coarse magnetite and Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn. Traffic pollution is characterized by Pb and Zn, and magnetite. Magnetic measurements of soils are capable of differentiating sources of magnetic minerals and heavy metals from industrial processes, vehicle fleets and soil parent material. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据