4.7 Article

Public practice regarding disposal of unused medicines in Ireland

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 478, 期 -, 页码 98-102

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.085

关键词

Questionnaire; Disposal; Household waste; Drugs; Medicine disposal; Unused medicines

资金

  1. Health Research Board of Ireland
  2. Millennium Research Fund of the National University of Ireland, Galway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Over recent years, a global increase in the use of pharmaceutical products has been observed. EU directives state that Member states shall ensure that appropriate collection systems are in place for medicinal products that are unused or have expired (Directive 2001/83/EC and Directive 2004/27/EC). Objectives: There is no published data on how people in Ireland dispose of unused medicines; therefore the purpose of this study is to establish baseline information on storage and disposal of medicines. Design: Data was collected over two 2-week periods a year apart. People in the streets of Galway and Cork were approached randomly and invited to participate by filling out a questionnaire. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 398 individuals (207 in Galway and 191 in Cork). Unused medicines were kept in the home by 88% of the respondents. The most cited reason for keeping unused medicines was in case they are needed later (68%). Of the respondents who had disposed of medicine in the past, 72% had done so inappropriately. Environmentally inappropriate disposal methods were through general waste disposal and via the sewage system. Interestingly, of the people who had received advice on disposal practices from a healthcare professional, 75% disposed of their medicine appropriately. Conclusions: There is little awareness among members of the public regarding appropriate ways to dispose of unused medicines. Our findings suggest that effective communication and established protocols will promote appropriate disposal practices. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据