4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Using biomarkers in wastewater to monitor community drug use: A conceptual approach for dealing with new psychoactive substances

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 487, 期 -, 页码 651-658

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.057

关键词

Drug epidemiology; Sewage analysis; New psychoactive substances

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data obtained from the analysis of wastewater from large-scale sewage treatment plants has been successfully applied to study trends in the use of classical illicit drugs such as cocaine, but the dynamic nature of the new psychoactive substances (NPS) market presents a unique set of challenges to epidemiologists. In an attempt to overcome some of the challenges, this paper presents a framework whereby a collection of tools and alternative data-sources can be used to support the design and implementation of wastewaterbased studies on NPS use. Within this framework the most likely and most suitable biomarkers for a given NPS are predicted via (in-silico) Under bar metabolism, biotransformation and sorption models. Subsequent detection and confirmation of the biomarkers in samples of wastewater are addressed via high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). The proposed framework is applied to a set of test substances including synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones. In general, the (in-silico) Under bar models predict that transformation via N-dealkylation and hydroxylation is likely for these compounds, and that adsorption is expected to be significant for cannabinoids in wastewater. Screening via HRMS is discussed with examples from the literature, and common-fragment searching and mass-defect filtering are successfully performed on test samples such that spectral noise is removed to leave only the information that is most likely to be related to the NPS biomarkers. HRMS screening is also applied to a set of pissoir-sourced wastewater samples and a total of 48 pharmaceuticals and drugs including 1-(2methoxyphenyl)piperazine (oMeOPP) are identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据