4.7 Article

Human health risk assessment with spatial analysis: Study of a population chronically exposed to arsenic through drinking water from Argentina

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 499, 期 -, 页码 166-174

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.058

关键词

Arsenic; Water pollution; Public health; Risk assessment; Geographic information systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic (As) is a ubiquitous element widely distributed in the environment. This metalloid has proven carcinogenic action in man. The aim of this work was to assess the health risk related to As exposure through drinking water in an Argentinean population, applying spatial analytical techniques in addition to conventional approaches. The study involved 650 inhabitants from Chaco and Santiago del Estero provinces. Arsenic in drinking water (Asw) and urine (UAs) was measured by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Average daily dose (ADD), hazard quotient (HQ), and carcinogenic risk (CR) were estimated, geo-referenced and integrated with demographical data by a health composite index (HI) applying geographic information system (GIS) analysis. Asw covered a wide range of concentration: from non-detectable (ND) to 2000 mu g/L. More than 90% of the population was exposed to As, with UAs levels above the intervention level of 100 mu g/g creatinine. GIS analysis described an expected level of exposure lower than the observed, indicating possible additional source/s of exposure to inorganic arsenic. In 68% of the locations, the population had a HQ greater than 1, and the CR ranged between 5.10(-5) and 2,1.10(-2). An environmental exposure area through ADD geo-referendng defined a baseline scenario for space-time risk assessment The time of residence, the demographic density and the potential health considered outcomes helped characterize the health risk in the region. The geospatial analysis contributed to delimitate and analyze the change tendencies of risk in the region, broadening the scopes of the results for a decision-making process. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据