4.7 Article

Micro-organic pollutants and biological response of mussels in marinas and ship building/breaking yards in Turkey

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 496, 期 -, 页码 165-178

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.035

关键词

Marina; Ship building/breaking yards; Micro-organic pollutants; Sediments; Mussels; Enzyme assays

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
  2. International Bureau of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [110Y194, PT-DLR 01DL12016]
  3. General Secretariat for Research and Technology, the Ministry for Development (Greece) [109Y383]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrations of PAHs, PCBs and OCPs in sediments and mussels (caged and/or native) were determined at 16 stations in six major sites of coastal Turkey. The biological effects of pollution were evaluated using sediment toxicity tests and enzyme activity assays. EROD, PROD, GST, AChE, CaE, and GR activities were evaluated using the digestive glands of mussels. The total PAH concentrations in the sediments varied between nd and 79,674 ng g(-1) dw, while the total OCP concentrations were in the range of nd to 53.7 ng g(-1) dw. The total PAH concentrations in mussels varied between 22.3 and 37.4 ng g(-1) ww. The average concentrations of total PCBs in mussels were 2795 pg g(-1) ww in the shipyard, 797 pg g(-1) ww in Marina 2 and 53 pg g(-1) ww in Marina 1 stations. The results of whole-sediment toxicity tests showed a strong correlation between toxicity test results and pollutant concentrations. Selected cytosolic enzyme activities in digestive glands differed significantly depending on localities. These differences in enzyme activities were mainly related to the different pollutant levels of the sampling sites. The micro-organic contaminant profile patterns, toxicity tests and biomarker studies showed that shipyards and shipbreaking yards are the major potential sources of organic pollution in coastal areas. (C) 2014 Elsevier BY. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据