4.7 Article

Distribution, partitioning and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the water-SPM-sediment system of Lake Chaohu, China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 496, 期 -, 页码 414-423

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.045

关键词

Lake Chaohu; PAHs; Water-SPM-sediment system; Spatial-temporal distribution; Partitioning; Source apportionment

资金

  1. National Project for Water Pollution Control [2012ZX07103-002]
  2. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41030529, 41271462, 41222026]
  3. National Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [40725004]
  4. 111 Project [B14001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The residual levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the water, suspended particular matter (SPM) and sediment from Lake Chaohu were measured with a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). The spatial-temporal distributions and the SPM-water partition of PAHs and their influencing factors were investigated. The potential sources and contributions of PAHs in the sediment were estimated by positive matrix factorization (PMF) and probabilistic stable isotopic analysis (PSIA). The results showed that the average residual levels of total PAHs (PAH16) in the water, SPM and sediment were 170.7 +/- 70.8 ng/L, 210.7 +/- 160.7 ng/L and 908.5 +/- 1878.1 ng/g dry weight, respectively. The same spatial distribution trend of PAH16 in the water, SPM and sediment was found from high to low: river inflows > western lake > eastern lake > water source area. There was an obvious seasonal trend of PAH16 in the water, while no obvious seasonal trend was found in the SPM. The residues and distributions of PAHs in the water, SPM and sediment relied heavily on carbon content. Significant Pearson correlations were found between LogK(oc) and LogK(ow) as well as some hydro-meteorological factors. Three major sources of PAHs including coal and biomass combustions, and vehicle emissions were identified. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据