4.7 Article

Source apportionment of PM2.5 at the coastal area in Korea

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 447, 期 -, 页码 370-380

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.047

关键词

PM2.5; Positive matrix factorization (PMF); Conditional probability function (CPF); Potential source contribution function (PSCF); Principal component analysis (PCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we analyzed the chemical composition of fine particulate matter 25 pm or less (PM2.5) collected at Incheon, the coastal area in Seoul, Korea every third day from June 2009 to May 2010. Based on the analyzed chemical species in the PM2.5 samples, the sources of PM2.5 were identified using a positive matrix factorization (PMF). Nine sources of PM2.5 were determined from PMF analysis. The major sources of PM2.5 were secondary nitrate (25.4%), secondary sulfate (19.0%), motor vehicle 1 (14.8%) with a lesser contribution from industry (8.5%), motor vehicle 2 (8.2%), biomass burning (6.1%), soil (6.1%), combustion and copper production emissions (6.1%), and sea salt (5.9%). From a paired t-test, it was found that yellow sand samples were characterized as having higher contribution from soil sources (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the likely source areas of PM2.5 emissions were determined using the conditional probability function (CPF) and the potential source contribution function (PSCF). CPF analysis identified the likely local sources of PM2.5 as motor vehicles and sea salt. PSCF analysis indicated that the likely source areas for secondary particles (sulfate and nitrate) were the major industrial areas in China. Finally, using the source contribution of PM2.5 and associated organic composition data, principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the PM2.5 source apportionments by PMF. The PCA analysis confirmed eight of the nine PM2.5 sources. Our result implies that the chemical composition analysis of PM2.5 data and various modeling techniques can effectively identify the potential contributing sources. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据