4.7 Review

Bioreceptivity of building stones: A review

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.026

关键词

Bioreceptivity; Stone; Microorganisms; Cultural heritage; Colonization experiments

资金

  1. CRUP (Accoes Integradas Luso-Espanholas) [E-110/10]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [Accion Integrada PT2009-0041, CSD2007-00058]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia-Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior [SFRH/BPD/63836/2009]
  4. CEPGIST FCT
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and innovation
  6. Spanish Ministry of Education [BES-2007-16996, AP2009-4421]
  7. Programa de Financiamento Plurianual de Unidades de Investigacao da FCT
  8. European Union
  9. national budget of the Portuguese Republic
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/63836/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 1995, Guillitte defined bioreceptivity, a new term in ecology, as the ability of a material to be colonized by living organisms. Information about the bioreceptivity of stone is of great importance since it will help us to understand the material properties which influence the development of biological colonization in the built environment, and will also provide useful information as regards selecting stones for the conservation of heritage monuments and construction of new buildings. Studies of the bioreceptivity of stone materials are reviewed here with the aim of providing a clear set of conclusions on the topic. Definitions of bioreceptivity are given, stone bioreceptivity experiments are described, and finally the stone properties related to bioreceptivity are discussed. We suggest that a standardized laboratory protocol for evaluating stone bioreceptivity and definition of a stone bioreceptivity index are required to enable creation of a database on the primary bioreceptivity of stone materials. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据