4.7 Article

Improved debromination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers by bimetallic iron-silver nanoparticles coupled with microwave energy

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 429, 期 -, 页码 300-308

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.051

关键词

Bimetallic iron-silver; PBDEs; Debromination; Nano technologies; Zero valent iron; Microwave energy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50938004]
  2. National Major Project of Science & Technology Ministry of China [2009CB421604, 2012ZX07529-003]
  3. Foundation of Furong Scholar project of Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the enhanced debromination of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) and 2,2,4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47) by Fe-Ag nano-particles under microwave radiation (Fe-Ag/MW). Fe-Ag bimetallic nano-particles were synthesized by reductive deposition of Ag on nano-iron and characterized with a number of techniques, including BET, XRD, TEM and XPS. Approximately 97% of BDE-209 or 78% of BDE-47 were rapidly transformed to its degradation products within 8 min in the Fe-Ag/MW system. The dehalogenation efficiency of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) was enhanced apparently by microwave radiation. Moreover, the microwave thermal energy played a significant role in accelerating the degradation reactions. Compared with nano-iron alone, the deposition of Ag also increased the rates of degradation. GC-MS and LC-MS/MS analyses of PBDEs' degradation products reveals that the possible degradation pathway proceeds through stepwise debromination from [n]-bromo- to [n-1]-bromo-DE, with bromine being substituted by hydrogen sequentially. Di- to nona-brominated congeners were formed during BDE-209 reduction, while diphenyl ether to tri-BDEs were observed during BDE-47 degradation. These results suggest that PBDEs can be debrominated rapidly by the innovative processes that may be environmentally friendly in applications. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据