4.7 Article

Crystal structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GlgE and complexes with non-covalent inhibitors

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep12830

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AI105084]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. Michigan Economic Development Corporation
  4. Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor [08P1000817]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GlgE is a bacterial maltosyltransferase that catalyzes the elongation of a cytosolic, branched alpha-glucan. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb), inactivation of GlgE (Mtb GlgE) results in the rapid death of the organism due to a toxic accumulation of the maltosyl donor, maltose-1-phosphate (M1P), suggesting that GlgE is an intriguing target for inhibitor design. In this study, the crystal structures of the Mtb GlgE in a binary complex with maltose and a ternary complex with maltose and a maltosyl-acceptor molecule, maltohexaose, were solved to 3.3 angstrom and 4.0 angstrom, respectively. The maltohexaose structure reveals a dominant site for alpha-glucan binding. To obtain more detailed interactions between first generation, non-covalent inhibitors and GlgE, a variant Streptomyces coelicolor GlgEI (Sco GlgEI-V279S) was made to better emulate the Mtb GlgE M1P binding site. The structure of Sco GlgEI-V279S complexed with alpha-maltose-C-phosphonate (MCP), a non-hydrolyzable substrate analogue, was solved to 1.9 angstrom resolution, and the structure of Sco GlgEI-V279S complexed with 2,5-dideoxy-3-O-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-2,5-imino-D-mannitol (DDGIM), an oxocarbenium mimic, was solved to 2.5 angstrom resolution. These structures detail important interactions that contribute to the inhibitory activity of these compounds, and provide information on future designs that may be exploited to improve upon these first generation GlgE inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据