4.7 Article

Inferences over the sources and processes affecting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere derived from measured data

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 408, 期 11, 页码 2387-2393

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.054

关键词

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH); Atmospheric reactivity; Principal Component Analysis (PCA); Receptor modelling

资金

  1. Catalan Government [2008 BE-1 00315]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [CTM2006-10152]
  3. NERC [NE/F016581/1, ncas10006] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F016581/1, ncas10006] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data concerning atmospheric lifetime and relative source contributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are fragmentary and contradictory. In this study, two datasets of measurements of atmospheric PAH (sum of particulate and gaseous phases), one from a national network, the other from a more local three-site study, were analysed and used to infer processes affecting PAH in the atmosphere, and their sources. PAH congener profiles measured at urban and rural locations were remarkably similar suggesting that atmospheric decay processes are relatively slow. This allows the use of such profiles to elucidate sources. A spatial analysis of two PAH datasets showed a clear influence of industry and road traffic upon local PAH concentrations. When Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to UK national network data, it showed a clear influence of steel industry emissions and of home heating emissions from coal and oil in Northern Ireland. These sites also showed different winter/summer concentration ratios to the main group of sites. In the data from Birmingham (UK), PCA identified separate factors relating to gasoline and diesel vehicles, as well as the influence of wood combustion on Bonfire night, and a factor related to home heating emissions which shows up only in the cold season. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据