4.7 Article

Temporal variation of 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio and 239+240PU inventory in water columns of the Japan Sea

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 408, 期 23, 页码 5951-5957

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.054

关键词

Pu-240/Pu-239 atom ratios; Temporal variability; Double-focusing SF-ICP-MS; Japan Sea; Tsushima Warm Current; Water column; Global stratospheric fallout; Close-in tropospheric fallout

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 239+240PU concentrations and Pu-240/Pu-239 atom ratios were determined by alpha spectrometry and double-focusing SF-ICP-MS for seawater samples obtained in 1984 and 1993 from the Yamato and Tsushima Basins of the Japan Sea in the western North Pacific margin The total Pu239+240 inventories in the whole water columns were approximately doubled during the period from 1984 to 1993 in the two basins The increasing rates were estimated to be 5 1 Bq m(-2) yr(-1) in the Yamato Basin and 42 Bq m(-2) yr(-1) in the Tsushima Basin and they corresponded to -0.02% of the annual Pu239+240 inflow rate into the Japan Sea through the Tsushima Strait. The mean Pu-240/Pu-239 atom ratios were -0 240 and significantly higher than the mean global fallout ratio of 0 18. Furthermore, there were no temporal or spatial variations of Pu-240/Pu-239 atom ratios during this period in the Japan Sea The total Pu239+240 inventories originating from the close-in fallout increased from 176 Bq m(-2) to 346 Bq m(-2) in the Yamato Basin and from 20.1 Bq m(-2) to 34.6 Bq m(-2) in the Tsushima Basin, however, the relative percentage of -40% from the close-in fallout was unchanged during this period A likely mechanism for the increasing Pu inventory would be the continuous inflow of the Tsushima Current from the western North Pacific, and the removal of Pu from surface waters by scavenging onto the settling particles, followed by regeneration of Pu from the settling particles during the downward transport. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据