4.7 Article

Effect of preparation methods on toxicity of fullerene water suspensions to Japanese medaka embryos

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 408, 期 22, 页码 5606-5612

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.055

关键词

Fullerene (nC(60)); Preparation methods; Nanotoxicity; Japanese medaka embryos

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0082745]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0082745] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physicochemical properties of fullerene water suspensions (nC(60)) and their subsequent toxicity were influenced by different preparation methods. The nC(60) suspensions were produced by three methods: toluene exchange (Tol/nC(60)). DMSO dissolving (DMSO/nC(60)), and stirring overtime (Aqu/nC(60)). The particle size, zeta potential, and nC(60) structure were strongly dependent on both the type of aggregates formed and the test medium addition. Specifically, Tol/nC(60) exhibited small and spherical closed aggregates, whereas DMSO/nC(60) and Aqu/nC(60) presented mesoscale aggregates of smaller spherical aggregates. These differences in the physicochemical properties of nC(60) determined the embryonic toxicity and oxidative stress of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). The mortality and glutathione (GSH) induction of embryos were ranked in the order of Tol/nC(60)>DMSO/nC(60)>Aqu/nC(60), and the morphological malformations were in the order of DMSO/nC(60)>Tol/nC(60)>Aqu/nC(60). The mortality of Tol/nC(60) was attributed to its closely packed fullerene structure, which remained as largely underivatized C(60). The malformations of DMSO/nC(60) might have originated from the co-effect of organic solvent remaining in the fullerene colloid. To summarize, these findings clearly illustrated the need to consider the effect of preparation method on the physicochemical properties when assessing nC(60) toxicity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据