4.7 Article

Detection of fungal development in a closed environment through the identification of specific VOC: Demonstration of a specific VOC fingerprint for fungal development

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 407, 期 1, 页码 139-146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.023

关键词

VOC; Fungal development; Moulds; Quality of indoor air; Chemical fingerprint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The occurrence of disease amongst the occupants of mouldy environments has been widely described in the literature. However, the detection of such moulds in closed environments remains difficult, particularly in the event of recent (before the first deterioration) or masked contamination (behind a material). In this context, the present study aimed to determine a specific chemical fingerprint for fungal development detectable in closed environments (dwellings, office, museum...). To achieve this, chemical emissions from sterile and artificially contaminated by moulds materials were analyzed and compared using a descriptive statistical method. Principal Component Analysis is thus chosen to analyze the results. PCA generated optimum and similar graphical representations of the scatterplot representing the data matrix. This statistical approach made it possible to identify an emission fingerprint without applying any preconception as to the type of emitted compound. Statistical analysis of the data then enabled confirmation of the impact of moulds on total VOC emissions. This emission of specific compounds resulted in obtaining a signature for the presence of fungal development in an environment, defined by specific ions. This analysis, and use of these ions applied to dwellings, made it possible to distinguish those with proven fungal development from those with no sign of mould or with a context favorable to fungal development, thus demonstrating that a chemical fingerprint specific to fungal development could be detected in indoor environments. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据