4.7 Article

The effects of repeated planting, planting density, and specific transfer pathways on PCB uptake by Cucurbita pepo grown in field conditions

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 405, 期 1-3, 页码 14-25

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.066

关键词

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); Phytoextraction; Bioaccumulation factors (BAFs); Uptake pathway; Phytoremediation; Field study

资金

  1. OCE [ENV03REM06]
  2. NSERC Collaborative Research Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in situ field investigation into the potential of PCB phytoextraction by Cucurbita pepo ssp. pepo (pumpkin) plants was continued for a second year at a field site known to be contaminated with a mixture of Aroclors 1254 and 1260 (average soil [PCB] = 21 mu g/g). Plant stem and leaf PCB concentrations in this second field season (11 and 8.9 mu g/g, respectively) were observed to increase significantly from the stem and leaf PCB concentrations reported in the previous year (5.7 and 3.9 mu g/g, respectively) while the total biomass produced as well as soil and plant root PCB concentrations did not change. Furthermore, the lower stems of some plants exhibited PCB concentrations as high as 43 mu g/g, resulting in bioaccumulation factors (where BAF(plant) (part) = [PCB](plant part)/ [PCB](soil)) for parts of the plant shoot as high as 2. increased planting density was observed to significantly decrease both plant biomass and plant stem PCB concentrations (to 7.7 mu g/g), but did not change plant root PCB concentrations. Finally, the results from this study provided further evidence that that under realistic field conditions, PCB transfer to pumpkin plants was primarily via root uptake and translocation. Other contaminant transfer pathways such as direct soil contamination, atmospheric deposition and volatilization from soil and subsequent redeposition on shoots appeared to have negligible contributions to overall pumpkin plant PCB burdens. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据