4.7 Article

Source apportionment of human personal exposure to volatile organic compounds in homes, offices and outdoors by chemical mass balance and genetic algorithm receptor models

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 407, 期 1, 页码 122-138

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.025

关键词

Indoor air quality (IAQ); Human personal exposure; Health effect; Source apportionment; Volatile organic compound (VOC); Genetic algorithm; Chemical mass balance (CMB) receptor model

资金

  1. DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst), New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of past studies have shown the prevalence of a considerable amount of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in workplace, home and outdoor microenvironments. The quantification of an individual's personal exposure to VOCs in each of these microenvironments is an essential task to recognize the health risks. In this paper, such a study of source apportionment of the human exposure to VOCs in homes, offices, and outdoors has been presented. Air samples, analysed for 25 organic compounds and sampled during one week in homes, offices, outdoors and close to persons, at seven locations in the city of Leipzig, have been utilized to recognize the concentration pattern of VOCs using the chemical mass balance (CMB) receptor model. In result, the largest contribution of VOCs to the personal exposure is from homes in the range of 42 to 73%, followed by outdoors, 18 to 34%, and the offices, 2 to 38% with the corresponding concentration ranges of 35 to 80 mu g m(-3), 10 to 45 mu g m(-3) and 1 to 30 mu g m(-3) respectively. The species such as benzene, dodecane, decane, methyl-cyclopentane, triethyltoluene and trichloroethylene dominate outdoors; methyl-cyclohexane, triethyltoluene, nonane, octane, tetraethyltoluene, undecane are highest in the offices; while, from the terpenoid group like 3-carane, limonene, a-pinene, b-pinene and the aromatics toluene and styrene most influence the homes. A genetic algorithm (GA) model has also been applied to carry out the source apportionment. its results are comparable with that of CMB. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据