4.7 Article

Impacts of water release operations on algal blooms in a tributary bay of Three Gorges Reservoir

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 1588-1598

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-011-4371-7

关键词

Three Gorges Reservoir; Xiangxi River; water release operation; algal bloom; water quality; wave-type operation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50779028, 41001348]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [50925932]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water release operation is crucial for water quality in large reservoirs such as Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), because it determines the hydrodynamics and hence the self-purification capability. As algal blooms were often observed in some tributary bays of TGR during the release periods, high frequency field observations were carried out in a typical eutrophic tributary bay (Xiangxi River) from February 9 to May 10, 2009. In this paper we assess the hydrodynamic behaviour, density stratification, and trophic status in this bay, respectively using a series of observations for flow, physical, chemical and biological parameters. Then, we analyze the effects of reservoir release operations on algal blooms using correlation analysis method. An empirical prognosis is concluded for the likelihood of algal bloom occurrence as a function of daily fluctuation of water level (DFWL) and water temperature. Our results indicate that during the release period, the algal bloom occurrences are closely tied to the DFWL in that if the ratio of DFWL to total water depth ranges from -10x10(-4) to 0, the possibility of algal blooms may reach up to 70%, and if the ratio is less than -10x10(-4), then that risk can be significantly reduced to less than 10%. This paper finally suggests that a wave-type water release operation should be beneficial in reducing bloom frequencies in the tributary water bodies, which is helpful for TGR water quality management, especially for the water release operation optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据