4.6 Article

Rapid separation and on-line detection by coupling high performance liquid chromatography with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 59, 页码 47640-47646

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra05562h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21033007, 21173155, 21303115, 21473118]
  2. National Instrumentation Program [2011YQ031240402]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012187]
  5. Natural Science Fundamental Research Project of Jiangsu Colleges and Universities [12KJD150011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid separation and detection of analytes have been the focus of a growing body of investigation for potential applications including food safety and environment science. However, the development of a robust analytical technique for simultaneous rapid separation and on-line detection remains a formidable challenge. Herein, we report a rational design based on the combination of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for the rapid separation and on-line detection of multi-analytes. In particular, a plasmonic nanoparticle-modified capillary (NPMC) is fabricated through a self-assembly process and connected to a HPLC effluent-end port. After separation by HPLC, the analytes are adsorbed onto plasmonic nanoparticles in the capillary and then detected by SERS. The resulting HPLC-SERS coupled detection system can simultaneously achieve rapid separation and provide on-line molecular structural information of multi-analytes. In addition, we also demonstrate the on-line detection of a pesticide molecule (thiram) in an orange using this combined system. Importantly, the detection limit can be down to 10(-7) mol L-1. These findings indicate that our coupled HPLC-SERS system offers a promising analytical technique in modern analytical science and technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据