4.6 Article

Superior ethanol-sensing behavior based on SnO2 mesocrystals incorporating orthorhombic and tetragonal phases

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 9143-9153

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra13940b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51271169]
  2. Key Science and Technology Innovation Team of Zhejiang Province [2010R50013]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT13037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SnO2 mesocrystals with mixed phases (i.e., tetragonal and orthorhombic phases) and nanoporous structures have been successfully synthesized via a facile annealing topotactic transformation from SnO precursors under ambient-pressure and a moderate temperature range of 400-600 degrees C. The morphology of the mesocrystal precursor possesses a hydrangea ball or multilayer pancake structure, which is determined by a novel ionothermal strategy using choline chloride/urea based deep eutectic solvent (DES) as the reaction medium and water as the morphology controlling agent. The self-assembly of SnO mesocrystals is based on a non-classical crystallization process involving an oriented attachment mechanism. The polarity dependent self-assembly of SnO mesocrystals in the reaction system is also highlighted. Significantly, the mixed phase and nanoporous SnO2 mesocrystal exhibits superior ethanol sensitivity compared with that of the SnO2 with a single tetragonal phase or a solid structure. The sensitivity of the SnO2 sample obtained at 400 degrees C is as high as 28.06 under 100 ppm ethanol and an optimum operation temperature of 300 degrees C, standing out from most of the state-of-the-art SnO2 nanomaterials, which is due to the incorporation of orthorhombic and tetragonal phases and the porous structure. Furthermore, the SnO2 mesocrystal with the mixed phases is also demonstrated to be a good selective ethanol sensor to effectively discriminate ethanol from acetone, methanol, and benzene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据