4.7 Article

Isolation and characterization of dengue virus serotype 2 from the large dengue outbreak in Guangdong, China in 2014

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 57, 期 12, 页码 1149-1155

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-014-4782-3

关键词

dengue virus serotype 2; virus isolation; phylogenetic analysis; envelope gene

类别

资金

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Program for Public Wellbeing [2014Y2-00185]
  2. Special Program of National Science and Technology of China [2013ZX10004-805]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81301491, 31270974]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dengue has been well recognized as a global public health threat, but only sporadic epidemics and imported cases were reported in recent decades in China. Since July 2014, an unexpected large dengue outbreak has occurred in Guangdong province, China, resulting in more than 40000 patients including six deaths. To clarify and characterize the causative agent of this outbreak, the acute phase serum from a patient diagnosed with severe dengue was subjected to virus isolation and high-throughput sequencing (HTS). Traditional real-time RT-PCR and HTS with Ion Torrent PGM detected the presence of dengue virus serotype 2 (DENV-2). A clinical DENV-2 isolate GZ05/2014 was obtained by culturing the patient serum in mosquito C6/36 cells. The complete genome of GZ05/2014 was determined and deposited in GenBank under the access number KP012546. Phylogenetic analysis based on the complete envelope gene showed that the newly DENV-2 isolate belonged to Cosmopolitan genotype and clustered closely with other Guangdong strains isolated in the past decade. No amino acid mutations that are obviously known to increase virulence or replication were identified throughout the genome of GZ05/2014. The high homology of Guangdong DENV-2 strains indicated the possibility of establishment of local DENV-2 circulation in Guangdong, China. These results help clarify the origin of this epidemic and predict the future status of dengue in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据