4.7 Article

Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from the medicinal plant Salvia miltiorrhiza

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 273-285

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-010-0005-8

关键词

expressed sequence tags; Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge.; gene identification; microsatellite

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2004BA701A35, 2006BAI06A12-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge. is a well-known traditional Chinese herb. Its roots have been formulated and used clinically for the treatment of various diseases. However, little genetic information has so far been available and this fact has become a major obstacle for molecular studies. To address this lack of genetic information, an Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) library from whole plantlets of S. miltiorrhiza was generated. From the 12959 cDNA clones that were randomly selected and subjected to single-pass sequencing from their 5' ends, 10288 ESTs (with sizes >= 100 bp) were selected and assembled into 1288 contigs, leaving 2937 singletons, for a total of 4225 unigenes. These were analyzed using BLASTX (against protein databases), RPS-BLAST (against a conserved domain database) as well as the web-based KEGG Automatic Annotation Server for metabolic enzyme assignment. Based on the metabolic enzyme assignment, expression patterns of 14 secondary metabolic enzyme genes in different organs and under different treatments were verified using real-time PCR analysis. Additionally, a total of 122 microsatellites were identified from the ESTs, with 89 having sufficient flanking sequences for primer design. This set of ESTs represents a significant proportion of the S. miltiorrhiza transcriptome, and gives preliminary insights into the gene complement of S. miltiorrhiza. They will prove useful for uncovering secondary metabolic pathways, analyzing cDNA-array based gene expression, genetic manipulation to improve yield of desirable secondary products, and molecular marker identification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据