4.5 Article

What happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory

期刊

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 769-788

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8

关键词

Midstream modulation; Technology assessment; Ethics of science and technology; Social responsibility; Socio-technical integration

资金

  1. Netherlands Genomics Initiative
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [0849101, 0531194]
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  4. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [0849101] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  6. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [937591, 0531194] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In response to widespread policy prescriptions for responsible innovation, social scientists and engineering ethicists, among others, have sought to engage natural scientists and engineers at the 'midstream': building interdisciplinary collaborations to integrate social and ethical considerations with research and development processes. Two 'laboratory engagement studies' have explored how applying the framework of midstream modulation could enhance the reflections of natural scientists on the socio-ethical context of their work. The results of these interdisciplinary collaborations confirm the utility of midstream modulation in encouraging both first- and second-order reflective learning. The potential for second-order reflective learning, in which underlying value systems become the object of reflection, is particularly significant with respect to addressing social responsibility in research practices. Midstream modulation served to render the socio-ethical context of research visible in the laboratory and helped enable research participants to more critically reflect on this broader context. While lab-based collaborations would benefit from being carried out in concert with activities at institutional and policy levels, midstream modulation could prove a valuable asset in the toolbox of interdisciplinary methods aimed at responsible innovation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据