4.8 Article

In situ TEM imaging of CaCO3 nucleation reveals coexistence of direct and indirect pathways

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 345, 期 6201, 页码 1158-1162

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1254051

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  2. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Scientific User Facilities Division
  3. U.S. Department of Defense, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship [32 CFR 168a]
  4. NSF [DMR-1312697]
  5. DOE [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1312697] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Materials Research [1312697] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanisms of nucleation from electrolyte solutions have been debated for more than a century. Recent discoveries of amorphous precursors and evidence for cluster aggregation and liquid-liquid separation contradict common assumptions of classical nucleation theory. Using in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to explore calcium carbonate (CaCO3) nucleation in a cell that enables reagent mixing, we demonstrate that multiple nucleation pathways are simultaneously operative, including formation both directly from solution and indirectly through transformation of amorphous and crystalline precursors. However, an amorphous-to-calcite transformation is not observed. The behavior of amorphous calcium carbonate upon dissolution suggests that it encompasses a spectrum of structures, including liquids and solids. These observations of competing direct and indirect pathways are consistent with classical predictions, whereas the behavior of amorphous particles hints at an underlying commonality among recently proposed precursor-based mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据