4.8 Article

Single-Cell Mass Cytometry of Differential Immune and Drug Responses Across a Human Hematopoietic Continuum

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 332, 期 6030, 页码 687-696

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1198704

关键词

-

资金

  1. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRG-2017-09]
  2. NIH [U19 AI057229, P01 CA034233, 272200700038C, 1R01CA130826, U54 CA149145, 5U54 CA143907, RB2-01592, PN2 EY018228, NOI-HV-00242]
  3. European Commission [HEALTH.2010.1.2-1]
  4. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [RB2-01592, DR-01477]
  5. Genome Canada via the Ontario Genomics Institute for Cancer Research
  6. Ontario Research Fund [ORF-GL2-01-003]
  7. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  8. Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flow cytometry is an essential tool for dissecting the functional complexity of hematopoiesis. We used single-cell mass cytometry to examine healthy human bone marrow, measuring 34 parameters simultaneously in single cells (binding of 31 antibodies, viability, DNA content, and relative cell size). The signaling behavior of cell subsets spanning a defined hematopoietic hierarchy was monitored with 18 simultaneous markers of functional signaling states perturbed by a set of ex vivo stimuli and inhibitors. The data set allowed for an algorithmically driven assembly of related cell types defined by surface antigen expression, providing a superimposable map of cell signaling responses in combination with drug inhibition. Visualized in this manner, the analysis revealed previously unappreciated instances of both precise signaling responses that were bounded within conventionally defined cell subsets and more continuous phosphorylation responses that crossed cell population boundaries in unexpected manners yet tracked closely with cellular phenotype. Collectively, such single-cell analyses provide system-wide views of immune signaling in healthy human hematopoiesis, against which drug action and disease can be compared for mechanistic studies and pharmacologic intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据