期刊
SCIENCE
卷 334, 期 6062, 页码 1512-1516出版社
AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1210879
关键词
-
资金
- European Research Council [232823]
- Biology and Biotechnology Sciences Research Center [BB/D015812/1]
- BBSRC [BB/D015812/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D015812/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Fifty years ago, Ernst Mayr published a hugely influential paper on the nature of causation in biology, in which he distinguished between proximate and ultimate causes. Mayr equated proximate causation with immediate factors (for example, physiology) and ultimate causation with evolutionary explanations (for example, natural selection). He argued that proximate and ultimate causes addressed different questions and were not alternatives. Mayr's account of causation remains widely accepted today, with both positive and negative ramifications. Several current debates in biology (for example, over evolution and development, niche construction, cooperation, and the evolution of language) are linked by a common axis of acceptance/rejection of Mayr's model of causation. We argue that Mayr's formulation has acted to stabilize the dominant evolutionary paradigm against change but may now hamper progress in the biological sciences.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据