4.8 Article

Erosion of Lizard Diversity by Climate Change and Altered Thermal Niches

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 328, 期 5980, 页码 894-899

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1184695

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Geographic Society, UC Mexus
  2. UCSC Committee-On-Research
  3. NSF [DEB 0108577, IBN 0213179, LTREB DEB 051597, DEB 0515909, 0844523, OISE 0530267]
  4. CNRS
  5. Museum Nationale d'Histoire Naturelle, Universite Paris 6, Universite Paul Sabatier Toulouse III [PAPIIT-UNAM IN213405, 224208]
  6. Universite Paul Sabatier Toulouse III
  7. CONACYT [4171N, 52852Q]
  8. CONACYT-SEP [43142-Q]
  9. ANR Blanche
  10. FONDYCET [1090664]
  11. SMSI [CGL2005-03156, CLG2008-04164, APCT-PICT1086]
  12. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  13. American Museum of Natural History
  14. Academy of Finland [108955]
  15. Australian Research Council
  16. PIRE-Patagonia
  17. Brigham Young University
  18. Academy of Finland (AKA) [108955, 108955] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  19. Direct For Biological Sciences
  20. Division Of Environmental Biology [0844523] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is predicted that climate change will cause species extinctions and distributional shifts in coming decades, but data to validate these predictions are relatively scarce. Here, we compare recent and historical surveys for 48 Mexican lizard species at 200 sites. Since 1975, 12% of local populations have gone extinct. We verified physiological models of extinction risk with observed local extinctions and extended projections worldwide. Since 1975, we estimate that 4% of local populations have gone extinct worldwide, but by 2080 local extinctions are projected to reach 39% worldwide, and species extinctions may reach 20%. Global extinction projections were validated with local extinctions observed from 1975 to 2009 for regional biotas on four other continents, suggesting that lizards have already crossed a threshold for extinctions caused by climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据