4.8 Article

Frictional Characteristics of Atomically Thin Sheets

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 328, 期 5974, 页码 76-80

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1184167

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMR-0520020, CMMI-0800154, CHE-0117752, CMMI-0927891]
  2. New York State Office of Science, Technology, and Academic Research (NYSTAR)
  3. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Center on Nanoscale Science and Technology for Integrated Micro/Nano-Electromechanical Transducers (iMINT) [HR0011-06-1-0048]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [MURI FA955009-1-0705]
  5. Swiss NSF
  6. National Centers of Competence in Research (NCCR) MaNEP
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  8. Directorate For Engineering [0800154, 0927891] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using friction force microscopy, we compared the nanoscale frictional characteristics of atomically thin sheets of graphene, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), niobium diselenide, and hexagonal boron nitride exfoliated onto a weakly adherent substrate (silicon oxide) to those of their bulk counterparts. Measurements down to single atomic sheets revealed that friction monotonically increased as the number of layers decreased for all four materials. Suspended graphene membranes showed the same trend, but binding the graphene strongly to a mica surface suppressed the trend. Tip-sample adhesion forces were indistinguishable for all thicknesses and substrate arrangements. Both graphene and MoS2 exhibited atomic lattice stick-slip friction, with the thinnest sheets possessing a sliding-length-dependent increase in static friction. These observations, coupled with finite element modeling, suggest that the trend arises from the thinner sheets' increased susceptibility to out-of-plane elastic deformation. The generality of the results indicates that this may be a universal characteristic of nanoscale friction for atomically thin materials weakly bound to substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据