4.6 Article

Non-classical CH center dot center dot center dot O hydrogen-bond determining the regio- and stereoselectivity in the [3+2] cycloaddition reaction of (Z)-C-phenyl-N-methylnitrone with dimethyl 2-benzylidenecyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylate. A topological electron-density study

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 120, 页码 99299-99311

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra20268j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of the Spanish Government [CTQ2013-45646-P]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  3. European Social Fund [BES-2014-068258]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of the ester groups in the regio- and stereoselectivities of the zw-type [3 + 2] cycloaddition (32CA) reaction of C-phenyl-N-methylnitrone with dimethyl 2-benzylidenecyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylate (BCPC) has been studied using DFT methods at the MPWB1K/6-31G(d) level. The possible ortho/meta regioisomeric channels and the endo/exo stereoselective approach modes were explored and characterized. Analysis of the relative energies associated with the different reaction pathways indicates that the presence of the two CO2Me groups in the cyclopropane ring has a remarkable effect on selectivities favouring the ortho/endo path, in good agreement with the experimental data. Inclusion of solvent effects increases the activation energy and decreases the exothermic character of both 32CA reactions but does not change gas phase selectivities. The electron localisation function (ELF) topological analysis along the most favourable ortho/endo path allows us to explain the formation of the C-C and O-C bonds through a non-concerted two-stage one-step mechanism. Non-covalent interaction (NCI) analysis of the most favourable ortho/endo transition state structure reveals that the formation of a non-classical CH center dot center dot center dot O hydrogen-bond involving the nitrone C-H hydrogen is responsible for the selectivity experimentally found in this non-polar zw-type 32CA reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据