4.4 Review

The use of polygenic risk scores to identify phenotypes associated with genetic risk of schizophrenia: Systematic review

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 2-8

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.10.037

关键词

Polygenic risk score; Schizophrenia; Genetic; Phenotypes

资金

  1. Mental Health Research UK
  2. Welsh Clinical Academic Track
  3. NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/S008349/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/L010305/1, MR/L023784/2, UKDRI-3003, G1001799, MR/N01104X/1, MR/N01104X/2, MR/P005748/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Wellcome Trust [213422/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. ESRC [ES/S008349/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [MR/P005748/1, MR/N01104X/1, UKDRI-3003, MR/N01104X/2, G1001799, MR/L023784/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying the phenotypic manifestations of increased genetic liability for schizophrenia can increase our understanding of this disorder. Specifically, information from alleles identified in genome-wide association studies can be collapsed into a polygenic risk score (PRS) to explore howgenetic risk ismanifestwithin different samples. In this systematic review, we provide a comprehensive assessment of studies examining associations between schizophrenia PRS (SZ-PRS) and several phenotypic measures. We searched EMBASE, Medline and PsycINFO (from August 2009-14th March 2016) plus references of included studies, following PRISMA guidelines. Study inclusion was based on predetermined criteria and data were extracted independently and in duplicate. Overall, SZ-PRS was associated with increased risk for psychiatric disorders such as depression and bipolar disorder, lower performance IQ and negative symptoms. SZ-PRS explained up to 6% of genetic variation in psychiatric phenotypes, compared to <0.7% in measures of cognition. Future gains fromusing the PRS approach may be greater if used for examining phenotypes that are more closely related to biological substrates, for scores based on genepathways, and where PRSs are used to stratify individuals for study of treatment response. As it was difficult to interpret findings across studies due to insufficient information provided by many studies, we propose a framework to guide robust reporting of PRS associations in the future. Crown Copyright (c) 2017 Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据