4.4 Review

Prescriber and institutional barriers and facilitators of clozapine use: A systematic review

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 10-19

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.046

关键词

Clozapine; Prescriber; Attitude; Barriers; Facilitators

资金

  1. INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, team pharmacoepidemiology [UMR 1219]
  2. NHMRC ECF [1111136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: As clozapine is under-prescribed in persons with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), it is necessary to better identify the determinants of health inequalities in access to clozapine use. Objective: To identify mental health professionals' characteristics or attitudes and institutional characteristics facilitating or limiting clozapine prescribing. Method: We systematically searched multiple electronic databases for articles reporting: (i) mental health professionals' attitudes and characteristics favoring or limiting clozapine prescribing; (ii) institutional characteristics associated with variations in clozapine prescribing; (iii) interventions aimed at enhancing clozapine prescribing. Data were synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 31 articles reporting findings of 29 studies published from 1993 to 2017 in 11 countries fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The main prescriber-related barriers to clozapine prescribing are lack of personal prescribing experience and concern with pharmacological characteristics of clozapine (blood monitoring and adverse effects). Lack of knowledge about the effectiveness of clozapine does not appear as a major determinant of underprescription. Institutional-related characteristics favoring clozapine prescribing are prescribers' adherence to evidence-based medicine principles and learning by modelling from experienced clozapine prescribers. Conclusion: Effective strategies to increase access to clozapine in personswith TRS include implementation of integrated clozapine clinics, simplification of blood monitoring, education for prescribers and contact with experienced prescribers. Programs addressing barriers in clozapine prescription need to be disseminated more broadly to ensure persons with TRS have access to evidenced based treatments such as clozapine. Inequality in access to clozapine care should be more systematically handled by mental health facilities and health regulatory agencies. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据