4.4 Article

Positive and negative schizotypy are associated with prodromal and schizophrenia-spectrum symptoms

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 145, 期 1-3, 页码 50-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.007

关键词

Schizotypy; Schizophrenia; Prodrome; Dimension

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [PSI2011-30321-C02-01]
  2. Fundacio La Marato de TV3 [091110]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya (Suport als Grups de Recerca) [2009SGR672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study examined the validity of psychometrically assessed positive and negative schizotypy in a study of 214 Spanish young adults using interview and questionnaire measures of impairment and psychopathology. Schizotypy provides a useful construct for understanding the etiology and development of schizophrenia and related disorders. Recent interview, laboratory, and experience sampling studies have supported the validity of psychometrically assessed positive and negative symptom dimensions. The present study expands on previous findings by examining the validity of these dimensions in a Spanish sample and employing a widely used interview measure of the schizophrenia prodrome. As hypothesized, the positive schizotypy dimension predicted CAARMS ultra high-risk or psychosis threshold status, and both dimensions uniquely predicted the presence of schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders. Furthermore, positive schizotypy was associated with psychotic-like, paranoid, schizotypal, and mood symptoms, whereas negative schizotypy was associated with interview ratings of negative and schizoid symptoms. The schizotypy dimensions were also distinguished by their associations with self and other schemas. Positive schizotypy was associated with increased negative self and other schemas, whereas negative schizotypy was associated with decreased positive self and other schemas. The findings provide further construct validation of positive and negative schizotypy and support these dimensions as universal constructs. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据