4.4 Article

Does long-acting injectable risperidone make a difference to the real-life treatment of schizophrenia? Results of the Cohort for the General study of Schizophrenia (CGS)

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 134, 期 2-3, 页码 187-194

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.022

关键词

Schizophrenia; Hospitalisation; Antipsychotics; Cohort study; Long-acting injectable antipsychotics

资金

  1. independent scientific board
  2. Janssen
  3. INSERM
  4. Astra-Zeneca
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Janssen (Johnson Johnson)
  7. Eli Lilly
  8. MSD
  9. Novartis
  10. Pfizer
  11. Roche
  12. Sanofi-Aventis
  13. LA-SER
  14. Laboratoires Servier
  15. Bristol Myers-Squibb
  16. Eutherapie
  17. Lilly
  18. Lundbeck
  19. Sanofi
  20. Servier
  21. Yolarx Consultants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to compare the impact of risperidone long-acting injectable (R-LAI) to other antipsychotics on rates of hospitalisation in real-life settings. Method: The Cohort for the General study of Schizophrenia (CGS) followed 1859 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) from 177 psychiatric wards of public and private hospitals across France over a mean period of 12 months. These patients were ambulatory or had been hospitalised for less than 93 days at study entry. Recruitment was stratified for long-acting second-generation antipsychotic use. A multivariate Poisson regression adjusted for confounding with propensity scores and allowing for autocorrelation was used for the calculation of relative rates of hospitalisation with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The mean age of participants was 37.65 years, 68.3% were male and 36.7% were hospitalised for less than 93 days at study entry. Altogether, participants accumulated 796 hospital stays (53.4 per 100 person-years). R-LAI patients were slightly younger and had been hospitalised more often in the past 12 months compared to non-R-LAI users. The adjusted Poisson regression analysis showed R-LAI use to be associated with a lower rate of future hospitalisation: 0.66 [0.46-0.96] compared to non-R-LAI use, and 0.53 [0.32-0.88] compared to use of other LAIs. Conclusion: Use of R-LAI was associated with lower rates of hospitalisation compared to non-use of R-LAI. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据