4.4 Article

REPYFLEC cognitive remediation group training in schizophrenia Looking for an integrative approach

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 142, 期 1-3, 页码 137-144

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.08.035

关键词

Cognitive remediation; Randomized controlled trial; Executive function; Functioning; Negative symptoms

资金

  1. Fundacio La Caixa
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI07/90476]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Overall results from Cognitive Remediation (CR) indicate robust and long-lasting effects with medium effect size on global cognition and functioning, and a small ES on symptoms present at post-treatment but not at follow-up. However, results are not the same in all CR therapies and in some cases no efficacy results are achieved. Aims: To develop an integrative intervention taking into account previous efficacious therapies. To evaluate the efficacy of our cognitive remediation group training: Problem Solving and Cognitive Flexibility training (REPYFLEC), with the aim of improving cognition and functioning in schizophrenia patients. Method: Participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n = 62) were randomized to 32 group sessions of REPYFLEC CR, or to 32 group sessions of activities without specific objectives and focused on leisure. In both groups the sessions were conducted twice a week. Functioning and psychiatric symptoms were measured at baseline (week 0) and thereafter at 8, 16 and 40 weeks. Cognition was measured at weeks 0, 16 and 40. Mixed Models were used to estimate statistical differences. Results: Patients in the cognitive remediation group demonstrated significant improvements in executive function, negative symptoms and functioning at post-treatment compared with patients in the control group. At 6-month follow-up, significant improvements in executive function and functioning remained. Conclusion: These results apparently show that REPYFLEC works as cognitive remediation training, improving executive thinking and functioning outcomes compared with a control group. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据